![]() "So far, Ukraine has been armed to secure the country’s survival. "Any attempt to abandon Ukraine or force the country into a compromise peace would be a moral and strategic failure of the highest order that the collective West would struggle to recover from. Mr Skrypchenko drives his point home even further. Instead, Ukraine’s lack of progress over the past two months should serve as a wake-up call for Western leaders." "But this does not grant anyone the right to pressure Ukraine into surrender. "Ukraine’s Western partners have every reason to expect a return on the considerable military aid they have provided over the past year-and-a-half," he says. The slow progress of the counteroffensive should force the West to scale up their support, rather than scale down - that's according to Maksym Skrypchenko, the president of the Kyiv-based Transatlantic Dialogue Centre. "The response to that was that 100,000 troops went in," she said. She argued that talks with Putin have been attempted over the years. Last month, foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said there was little chance negotiations would end the way any time soon. In May, French President Macron said that negotiating with Vladimir Putin would take priority over a war crimes trial, if the need arises. Ukraine went into last weekend's Jeddah talks saying it wants a peace summit with Russia this autumn - as long as it's on their terms, centred on their own framework.īut there's a sense that Ukraine's allies are splintering on whether negotiations are the answer. It's led to a narrative that the counteroffensive isn't moving as quickly or successfully as it needs to, if it is to justify the West's expensive and growing support. In the weeks since Ukraine launched its long-awaited counteroffensive on the eastern front, it's been hard to identify any substantial moments that you could call a turning point in the war.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |